03 May Develop evidenced-based practice questions using PICO format.
Posted at 04:35h
in
Nursing
by
Everything must be in APA 7 format. The second file is the Template from the Instructor. Please do not copy the references. Follow the Sub headings strictly (as listed below)….
Introduction,
Significance of the problem,
PICO format clinical question,
Population,
Intervention,
Comparison,
Outcome,
Set Strategy and Results,
Synthesis of Literature,
Practice Recommendation,
Conclusion, References,
Table 1 Synthesis Matrix,
Table 2 Primary Research Evidence,
Table 3 Evidence Summaries.
TOPIC: Nurse Burnout
Purpose
The purpose of assignment is to provide experience and feedback with the development of a clinical question of interest to you using the PICO format along with designing and documenting the results of a search for scientific literature related to the clinical question. This assignment is intended to allow you to show evidence of achievement of:
1: Develop evidenced-based practice questions using PICO format.
The purpose of assignment is to provide experience and feedback with the development of evidence tables, synthesis of evidence, and a practice recommendation based on the best available evidence and related to the clinical question of interest to you. This assignment is intended to allow you to show evidence of achievement of:
2: Conduct a literature search for research evidence related to a practice question.
3: Summarize high quality evidence to synthesize into a practice recommendation.
4: Develop a planned change process and a data-driven evaluation for a practice change.
5: Add your plan to implement and evaluate your proposed practice change
Requirements
An APA template is provided which describes the expectations for each section of this scholarly paper. Graduate level writing is expected. The following rubric will be used to score this assignment.
More than 15 references with at least 10 research references AND only websites used were .org, .edu, or .gov. All research studies are from the United States
Requirements
This scholarly paper is due on day 7 of week 6. For this assignment, you will need to revise your practice problem and PICO sections of the previous paper using feedback from your instructor because this paper is a continuation of that paper. An APA template is provided which describes the expectations for each section of this scholarly paper but also refer to the rubric. The evidence tables, one for primary single research studies and one for evidence summaries, are included as appendices, as well as a synthesis matrix to help you organize the information for your paper and must be submitted.
You are summarizing and synthesizing the evidence to make a practice recommendation, rather than reviewing each study.
RUBRIC
Synthesis Project: Part II Rubric
|
Synthesis Project: Part II Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction
|
|
10 to >9.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
The introduction clearly and concisely states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence that is engaging and thought-provoking. The introduction clearly states and describes the main topic and previews the structure and content of the paper.
|
9 to >8.0 pts
Meets expectations
The introduction states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence but it fails to be engaging. The introduction states the main topic but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Barely meets expectations
The introduction does state the paper’s purpose but it is convoluted and not engaging. The introduction does not clearly state the topic or preview the structure and content of the paper.
|
7 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
Incomplete or unfocused purpose statement. There is no clear introduction of main topic and/or the structure of the paper is missing.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Significance of the Practice Problem
|
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
This section effectively describes the significance of the problem including human and societal impact as well as other areas of impact. The problem is significant to the student’s identified practice area and has significant impact on the student’s discipline and patient outcomes. Current data on incidence and/or prevalence is included. Exemplary discussion of cultural, political, legal, ethical, quality, safety, and financial implications is included if appropriate. There is substantiation with adequate number and quality of professional references with no uncited statements of fact. The student made all of the corrections recommended in the practice problem/PICO assignment
|
18 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectations
This section describes the significance of the problem including human and societal impact. The problem is significant to the student’s identified practice area. Current data on incidence and/or prevalence is included. Cultural, political, legal, ethical, quality, safety, and financial implications are included if appropriate. There is substantiation with adequate number and quality of professional references with no uncited statements of fact. The student made most of the corrections recommended in the practice problem/PICO paper assignment.
|
16 to >14.0 pts
Barely meets expectations
This section provides a brief description of the problem but fails to describes the significance of the problem including human and societal impact. The problem is significant to the student’s identified practice area. Current data on incidence and/or prevalence is limited and cultural, political, legal, ethical, quality, and safety implications are either not included even when appropriate. There is substantiation with only a limited number and quality of professional references with no uncited statements of fact. The student made some of the corrections recommended in the practice problem/PICO paper assignment.
|
14 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
This section identifies the problem but does not effectively describe the significance of the problem. The problem is not a current issue or the issue does have significance to the student’s identified practice area. Current data on incidence and/or prevalence and/or cultural, political, legal, ethical, quality, safety, and financial implications are not included. There is no substantiation with an adequate number and quality of professional references and/or there are uncited statements of fact. The student did not make corrections recommended the practice problem/PICO paper assignment.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome PICO
|
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
There is a clear description of the population/problem of interest, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timing. The student made all corrections recommended in the practice problem/PICO paper assignment.
|
18 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectations
There is a description of the population/problem of interest, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timing. The student made most of corrections recommended in the practice problem/PICO paper assignment.
|
16 to >14.0 pts
Barely meets expectations
There is a superficial description of the population/problem of interest, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timing. The student made some of corrections recommended in the practice problem/PICO paper assignment.
|
14 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
There is an incomplete description of the population/problem of interest, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timing. The student did not make corrections recommended in the practice problem/PICO paper assignment.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Search Strategy and Results
|
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
There is an exemplary discussion of the search strategy which includes keywords (with alternate spellings, abbreviations, etc.), MESH headings, inclusion and exclusion criteria, databases used and results of the search. Any studies which meet inclusion criteria and do not meet exclusion criteria but are excluded are explained. The search is clearly replicable by any reader.
|
18 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectations
The discussion of the search strategy includes keywords, inclusion and exclusion criteria, databases used and results of the search. Any studies which meet inclusion criteria and do not meet exclusion criteria but are excluded are explained. The search may not be replicable by any reader.
|
16 to >14.0 pts
Barely meets expectations
The discussion of the search strategy includes keywords, inclusion and exclusion criteria, data bases used and results of the search. There is not explanation of exclusion of studies which meet inclusion criteria and do not meet exclusion criteria. The search is not replicable.
|
14 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
The search strategy and results are superficial and/or difficult to understand.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Synthesis of the Literature
|
|
40 to >36.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Substantial review of the literature is evident in the synthesis and covers all facets of the problem with numerous (more than 5 primary research articles and/or summaries) references linking the practice problem and the selected intervention. This section is a synthesis rather than a study by study review of the literature. Only research evidence is included in the synthesis; no secondary sources are included. Studies from US only are include unless valid reason is given for inclusion of international studies.
|
36 to >32.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Substantial review of the literature is evident in the synthesis and covers all facets of the problem with numerous (at least 5 primary research articles and/or summaries) references linking the practice problem and the selected intervention. This section is a synthesis rather than a study by study review of the literature. Only research evidence is included in the synthesis; no secondary sources are included. Studies from US only are include unless valid reason is given for inclusion of international studies.
|
32 to >30.0 pts
Barely meets expectations
A review of the literature is evident in the synthesis and covers most facets of the problem with fewer than 5 primary research articles and/or summaries linking the practice problem and the selected intervention OR this section is a study by study review of the literature rather than a synthesis OR nonresearch and secondary sources are included. International studies are included and a valid reason is not given for their inclusion.
|
30 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
Only a superficial review of the literature is evident with fewer than 3 primary research articles and/or summaries linking the practice problem and the selected intervention OR this section is a study by study review of the literature rather than a synthesis AND nonresearch and secondary sources are included.
|
|
40 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Synthesis Matrix
|
|
10 to >9.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
There is an exemplary synthesis matrix with multiple main ideas included as a Table. The main ideas are logically extracted from the evidence and each one is cited in three or more references. All studies that were not excluded by identified exclusion criteria are included on the matrix.
|
9 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectations
The synthesis matrix has at least 3 main ideas is included as a Table. The main ideas are logically extracted from the evidence and each one is cited in at least two references. All studies that were not excluded by identified exclusion criteria are included on the matrix. Incorrect formatting used.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Barely meets expectations
The synthesis matrix included as a Table has fewer than 3 main ideas OR only 1-2 studies that were not excluded by identified exclusion criteria were not included on the matrix. Incorrect formatting used.
|
7 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
The synthesis matrix included as a Table has fewer than 3 main ideas AND several studies that were not excluded by identified exclusion criteria were not include on the matrix. Incorrect formatting used.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Practice Recommendations
|
|
20 to >17.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
There is an exemplary description of the practice recommendation and it is based on only high level evidence (levels I-III). The practice recommendations are consistent with the synthesis of the literature. There is logical progression from the synthesis of the literature to the practice recommendation. The recommendation is written succinctly and consistent with the scientific evidence. The Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice rating for level and quality is included and appropriate.
|
17 to >14.0 pts
Meets Expectations
There is a description of the practice recommendation and it is based on only high level evidence. The practice recommendation is consistent with the scientific evidence and there is a logical progression from the synthesis of the literature to the practice recommendation. The Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice rating for level and quality is included and appropriate.
|
14 to >10.0 pts
Barely meets expectations
There is a description of the practice recommendation but it is not based on high level evidence and/or the recommendation is convoluted and not consistent with high level scientific evidence. The Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice rating for level and quality is included but not appropriate.
|
10 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
There is a superficial practice recommendation but it is based on nonscientific evidence and/or the recommendation is not consistent with the scientific evidence and/or the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice rating for level and quality is not included.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence Tables
|
|
50 to >45.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Evidence tables of primary research and systematic reviews are included as tables and include more than 7 primary research and/or summaries. Only research evidence is included on the evidence table and is appropriate to use in the setting and population. No secondary sources are included. The tables show an excellent extraction of information from the published reports. Used the provided template with the correct formatting. Paraphrased and did not copy directly from source.
|
45 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectations
Evidence tables of primary research and systematic reviews are included as tables and include more than 5 primary research and/or summaries. Only research evidence is included on the evidence table. and is appropriate to use in the setting and population. No secondary sources are included. The tables are complete and accurate.
|
40 to >35.0 pts
Barely meets expectations
Evidence tables of primary research and systematic reviews are included as tables but include 5 primary research and/or summaries. Only research evidence is included on the evidence table and is appropriate to use in the setting and population. No secondary sources are included. The tables are incomplete or the information in the tables is inaccurate.
|
35 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
Evidence tables of primary research and systematic reviews are not included as tables OR the evidence tables contain nonresearch publications OR secondary sources OR the number of primary research studies plus the systematic reviews is less than 5 OR studies are inappropriate to setting or population.
|
|
50 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion
|
|
10 to >9.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
The conclusion reviews the main topics presented and clearly and effectively summarizes significant conclusions. Does not introduce new information.
|
9 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectations
The conclusion reviews the main topics presented and summarizes significant conclusions.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Barely meets expectations
There is either a summary OR a conclusion.
|
7 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
There is neither a conclusion or summary.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communication in Writing
|
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
There is logical sequencing of ideas through well-developed paragraphs; transitions are used to enhance organization. There are no more than 2 errors in punctuation, capitalization, or spelling. There are no errors in sentence structure or word usage. Paraphrasing is used effectively. No more than 1 direct quotation used.
|
18 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectations
There is logical sequencing of ideas through well-developed paragraphs; transitions are usually effective in enhancing organization. There are few (2-4) errors in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, sentence structure or word usage. There are no more than 2 quotations.
|
16 to >14.0 pts
Barely meets expectations
There is logical organization but some ideas are not fully or consistently developed OR transitions are awkward at times although the flow is adequately maintained. There are several (5-8) errors in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, sentence structure or word usage. There are more than 2 quotations.
|
14 to >0 pts
Does not meet expectations
There is no evidence of structure or organization. Ideas are not fully developed. Minimal use of transitions throughout the paper. There are >8 errors in punctuation, capitalization, spelling, sentence structure, or word usage with significant impact on the content and detracts from the paper. There are more than 4 quotations.
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA 7th
• Title page • Headings • Citations • Reference page • Font, layout, margins
|
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Wridemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Place Order” and we will
direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.
