17 Apr This week, you will examine a case study that demonstrates the effectiveness of different leadership approaches of two individuals in a company and will prov
This week, you will examine a case study that demonstrates the effectiveness of different leadership approaches of two individuals in a company and will provide to the business owner/general manager a report that details your observations and recommendations. This case provides an opportunity to evaluate and contrast different leadership styles and theories in a real-world context.
Scenario
The owner/general manager of House, Hearth and Home, a large retail hardware, furniture, and building center, is facing a dilemma regarding the leadership effectiveness of his long-time yard manager and that of a newly hired assistant manager. The owner has hired you as a consultant and has asked you to investigate and then report your findings and recommendations on how he should address this situation.
For this week’s Assignment, you will prepare a business report to the company owner/GM that addresses the leadership theory or framework that Dan Boyd and Wesley Simpson each employ, the differences in their leadership style, along with a discussion on which approach you feel is more effective for this company’s situation and why. You will complete your evaluation of House, Hearth and Home by providing your recommendations on how the company owner/GM should address the situation. Be sure to provide specific examples from the case and relevant citations from the Learning Resources, the library, and/or other credible, appropriate academic sources to substantiate and validate your position. For more information about evaluating the credibility of sources for use in your coursework, please review the following video:
- Walden University, LLC. (2021). Evaluating the credibility of sources [Video]. Walden University Canvas. https://waldenu.instructure.com
Submit Part 1 of your evaluation of leadership for House, Hearth and Home, in which you address the following in a 3.5- to 6-page business report (excluding references):
- Based on your case analysis, what leadership theory or framework do Dan Boyd and Wesley Simpson each employ? Be sure to provide specific examples from the case and other academic sources to validate your position.
- What are the differences in leadership style for each of these individuals?
- Which approach do you feel is more effective for this company’s situation, and why? Include the pros and cons of each approach in your assessment.
- Based on your evaluation of the situation and considering your assessment of which leadership approach is more effective for this company's situation, make at least three recommendations for changes that Mr. Coglin should implement to address his concerns.
- As part of your recommendations, include any risks Coglin should consider that would be associated with a) making each of the recommended changes and b) not making any changes.
Week 2 Assignment: An Evaluation of Leadership for House, Hearth and Home
Prepared by: Replace this text with your name.
Date: Replace this text with the submission date.
Walden University
MBAX 6000A/MLDR 6000A: Dynamic Leadership
Leadership Approaches and Styles
Replace this text with introductory information. Add or remove headings as necessary.
Evaluation of Leadership Theories/Frameworks and Styles
Add or remove headings as necessary or adjust the suggested heading title if you prefer. Replace this text with your response to the following: Based on your case analysis, what leadership theory or framework do Dan Boyd and Wesley Simpson each employ? Be sure to provide specific examples from the case and other academic sources to validate your position.
Replace this text with your response to the following: What are the differences in leadership style for each of these individuals?
Assessment of Effective Leadership Approach for House, Hearth and Home
Add or remove headings as necessary, or adjust the suggested heading title if you prefer. Replace this text with your response to the following: Which approach do you feel is more effective for this company’s situation, and why? Include the pros and cons of each approach in your assessment.
Recommendations
Replace this text with introductory information. Add or remove headings as necessary.
Recommended Changes and Risk Assessment Add or remove headings as necessary, or adjust the suggested heading title if you prefer. Replace this text with your response to the following: Based on your evaluation of the situation and considering your assessment of which leadership approach is more effective for this company’s situation, make at least three recommendations for changes that Mr.Coglin should implement to address his concerns.
Replace this text with your response to the following: As part of your recommendations, include any risks Coglin should consider that would be associated with a) making the recommended changes and b) not making any changes.
[Please delete this note before submitting Assignment. For more information about formatting your reference list, please visit the following site: https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/references.]
Include appropriately formatted references to support your Assignment.
Refer to the Assignment guidelines for further information on the requirements.
,
How to Analyze a Business Case Study
Table of Contents • What Is a Business Case Study? • Why Use Case Studies in Business Courses? • The Three Common Types of Business Cases • Analyzing a Business Case Study 2© 2022 Walden University, LLC
What Is a Business Case Study? • Business case studies present complex business issues. They are designed to turn real-world situations into teachable moments.
• The business situation in each case study is presented from multiple perspectives and highlights the interdependencies and non-linear nature of the information.
•Characteristics of a case study include:
· Identifying a significant issue, question, or dilemma
· Presenting comprehensive information to draw a conclusion
· Providing no objective conclusion, allowing the reader to draw their own conclusion(s)—just like in real life
· Presenting facts in a non-linear fashion, unlike a textbook that presents information in a logical or progressive method
3© 2022 Walden University, LLC
Why Use Case Studies in Business Courses? • A business case study provides you with a controlled (safe) environment to discuss, practice, and apply the business skills presented to you throughout your course work. • You can draw multiple conclusions from a case study, which simulates a real-life setting and allows you to present multiple solutions.
· There is typically no “right” decision, answer, or solution. 4© 2022 Walden University, LLC
The Three Common Types of Business Case Studies
Decision Scenario Case • In this type of case study, a critical decision is required, typically from the main character of the case study. After analyzing the case study, you would recommend what decision to make and explain why.
Problem-Diagnosis Case • In this type of case study, you would perform a comprehensive diagnosis that identifies the root cause of the problem described in the case and recommend corrective action.
Evaluation Scenario Case • In this type of case study, you would perform an in-depth evaluation to determine the pros and cons or strengths and weaknesses of the subject of the case study and then make appropriate recommendations. 5© 2022 Walden University, LLC
Analyzing a Business Case Study • A case study analysis is not merely a summary of the case. Instead, it is a systematic analysis of the evidence within the case in order to identify the dilemma and then develop recommendations to answer, mitigate, or resolve it. • When asked to analyze a case study within your course work, you will typically be provided with assignment instructions and a list of questions and/or prompts to help guide your analysis. You should begin your case study analysis by carefully reviewing these requirements, along with accompanying rubrics or other guidelines, to understand the objective(s) of your analysis. 6© 2022 Walden University, LLC
Analyzing a Business Case Study • Important Disclaimer: The following slides provide some tips or guidelines for basic case study analysis. The purpose of each step described is to ensure you are equipped to analyze the information in the case in a way that will support your work on any academic case study assignments you encounter. The following guidance is not meant to replace or take precedence over any specific assignment instructions. You should always ensure that you adhere to the requirements for any assignments and use the information in this document for additional support. 7© 2022 Walden University, LLC
Analyzing a Business Case Study • Case study analysis can be broken down into the following five basic steps: Step 1: Find and highlight the most important facts surrounding the case. Step 2: Find the cause and effect of the dilemma. Step 3: Consider the course(s) of action. Step 4: Evaluate the alternative action(s) to answer, mitigate, or resolve the dilemma. Step 5: Recommend the suggested course of action based on the evaluations (i.e., your best solution). 8© 2022 Walden University, LLC
Analyzing a Business Case Study: Step 1
Find and highlight the most important facts surrounding the case. • Read through the case several times to become familiar with the information it contains, paying attention to the information in any exhibits, tables, or figures. You may find that the case study provides a great amount of detailed information. As in real life, some of the information is more relevant than others in identifying the dilemma. Your job in this step is to determine what is relevant and what is not. • As you read through the case, you may want to underline, highlight, and/or list the most important facts and/or figures that will help you understand and define the dilemma. You can assume all of the presented facts and figures in the case are true; however, some of the statements, judgments, and/or decisions made by individual characters may be questioned. (Remember, these are opinions and observations of individuals—just like in real life, they can be biased.) Note: It is good to compare and contrast individuals’ statements to help you determine facts. 9© 2022 Walden University, LLC
Analyzing a Business Case Study: Step 2
Find the cause and effect of the dilemma. • This is the main analysis step of the process. (Note: You will be applying many of your learned business knowledge and skills to help you to determine cause and effect of the identified dilemma.) • In this step, you can use the facts you highlighted in the previous step to identify the key issue(s) of the case. As case studies may present multiple issues associated with the main dilemma, you will want to be able to identify the most relevant, always referring to the assignment instruction prompts and the business topic(s) being studied for guidance. • Next, you should be able to understand how and why the dilemma occurred and how it affects the organization in the study. You may want to jot down some facts from the case to help you substantiate your position as part of your assignment. (Items to consider: Is this the result of management or leadership issues, technology issues, systems or process issues, market or external issues, etc.?) 10© 2022 Walden University, LLC
Analyzing a Business Case Study: Step 3
Consider the course(s) of action. • You may want to create a list of the actions that can be taken to answer, mitigate, or resolve the issue(s) that led to the identified dilemma. These actions should be validated, not only by the evidence within the case study but also through credible sources beyond the case study. Remember to consult your assignment instruction prompts and the business topic/skill being presented for guidance. • Some questions to determine the course(s) of action might be:
· Are new technologies, business processes, organizational structures, or management behavior required?
· What changes to organizational processes would be required by each alternative?
· What management policy would be required to implement each alternative? 11© 2022 Walden University, LLC
Analyzing a Business Case Study: Step 4
Evaluate the alternative action(s) to answer, mitigate, or resolve the dilemma. • Evaluate each of the identified actions you listed in Step 3. Ask yourself: What would be the likely outcome if this corrective action were implemented? • Identify the challenges/risks and benefits of each of the actions. Consider whether each action is feasible from a technical, operational, and financial standpoint. Be sure to note any assumptions on which you have based your decision and validate these assumptions. 12© 2022 Walden University, LLC
Analyzing a Business Case Study: Step 5
Recommend the suggested course of action based on the evaluations (i.e., your best solution). • From your evaluation of your potential corrective actions, select your choice for the best action to be implemented and make some notes as to why you made this decision. • Your final recommendation should flow logically from the rest of your case analysis and should clearly specify what assumptions were used to guide and shape your conclusion. (Remember, there is typically, by design, no single “right” answer.) 13© 2022 Walden University, LLC
References • Ellet, W. (2007). The case study handbook : How to read, discuss, and write persuasively about cases. Harvard Business School Press. • Wienstein, A., Brotspies, H. V., & Gironda, J. T. (2020). Do your students know how to analyze a case – Really? Harvard Business Publishing-Education.
,
S w
W12313
HOUSE, HEARTH AND HOME: MANAGING LEADERSHIP CHANGE
Karen MacMillan and Meredith Woodwark wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality. Richard Ivey School of Business Foundation prohibits any form of reproduction, storage or transmission without its written permission. Reproduction of this material is not covered under authorization by any reproduction rights organization. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, contact Ivey Publishing, Richard Ivey School of Business Foundation, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 3K7; phone (519) 661-3208; fax (519) 661-3882; e-mail [email protected]. Copyright © 2012, Richard Ivey School of Business Foundation Version: 2012-11-15
Mark Coglin, the owner and general manager of House, Hearth and Home, a large hardware, furniture and building centre, faced a dilemma about whether his long-time yard manager, Wesley Simpson, was still the right person for the job. The business increasingly depended on providing superior customer service in order to compete in the market. Recently, Coglin had placed a personal friend, Dan Boyd, in the operation as an assistant to the yard manager. This new addition had shown a real talent for developing employees and driving performance improvements. As a result, customer service feedback had drastically improved. Coglin realized that the assistant had become the real leader of the yard. He wondered how to keep the momentum of the changes going while still showing due respect to a loyal employee. On his way to the front of the store to check out the new displays, Coglin paused as he looked down at the name displayed on the ringing cell phone attached to his belt. He groaned inwardly when he realized the caller was Brody Graham, an important but hard-to-please customer. Graham was not shy about calling Coglin directly when his store failed to deliver in any way. As owner and general manager, Coglin had some experience with disgruntled customers whose complaints often landed on his lap. Although it was impossible to keep every customer fully satisfied every day, each member of his staff was asked to do just that. Customer service had become increasingly important to Coglin as big box hardware and building centres kept popping up everywhere. The sheer buying power of these goliaths made it difficult to compete with them on some aspects, but, in the opinion of some, their size led to certain weaknesses. For instance, they were so cavernous, it often seemed that there were too few people in place to wait on potential customers. House, Hearth and Home offered a much more intimate shopping experience, and this was its key differentiator from these powerful competitors. With the recent economic downturn, Coglin was more mindful than ever that his customers had plenty of other retail options, so that exceeding their expectations was the only way to stay competitive. He felt confident that good customer service would keep people rolling in. With annual sales of over $20 million, there was evidence that his strategy was sound. So, even though he expected an earful of complaints from Graham, Coglin tried to insert a smile in his voice as he answered the phone. He began the conversation with a compliment: “Brody! How are you
This document is authorized for use only by Lakenya Campbell in Dynamic Leadership-Spring 2025 at Walden University (Canvas), 2025.
Page 2 9B12C048 doing? The other day I drove by those houses you’re building — they are looking really nice!” To Coglin’s surprise, Graham’s reply was positively jovial: “They are going together good. Can I talk you into buying one or two? You always charge me the contractor rate, so for my number one supplier, I’ll give you the supplier discount!” Chuckling, Coglin answered, “Think I’ll pass this time, but thanks for the offer. Now what problem can I take care of for you today?” As he spoke, Coglin walked over to the service desk so he would have a hard surface on which to write. Chances were that Graham was perturbed that something had not been delivered on time. It would help to jot down the order number so he could track what was holding it up. As a contractor, Graham relied on House, Hearth and Home to deliver building materials on a just-in-time basis. When the proper material was not delivered when expected, it meant that the workers would be held up, creating a valueless expense Graham wanted to minimize. The more people sat around waiting and the longer it took to finish a building job, the less profit could be made. Following up late orders would normally be the job of the yard manager, but if a customer like Graham wanted to escalate the problem to the owner right off the bat, Coglin would accommodate. But Graham had a surprise in store. He said, “Actually, I don’t have a problem today, which is the reason I’m calling. The guys in the yard have really been coming through for me lately. We had some last minute order changes two weeks ago, and they took care of us real good. At first I thought it was a fluke, but they have been on fire this week, too. So whatever you have been putting in the water, keep throwing it in there, buddy!” Coglin could barely believe what he was hearing: Brody Graham was . . . happy? He thanked him for the call as he walked towards the materials yard. The yard was the transition point for most of the large-scale building material leaving the store — lumber, drywall, shingles, bricks, insulation, etc. Customers would develop an order inside the store then pull a vehicle around to the yard to get big items loaded. Professional contractors could arrange for the store to deliver material to job sites on an ongoing basis. In that case, the yard workers were responsible for keeping track of these orders, pulling the right material on the right day, loading it onto trucks and delivering them to wherever the work was going on. As Coglin stepped into the yard, he saw Simpson, the yard manager, talking to a customer. As he waited for the talk to end, he walked around a bit. He was happy to see that everything looked well organized. Customers often came into this area, and it reflected badly on the whole organization when any part was sloppy. A part-time employee had hustled up to load patio stones into the pickup of the customer talking to Simpson. When the young man finished, he shut the tailgate with a loud thump. As if on cue, Simpson offered his hand to the customer, and Coglin could hear him say, “Thanks a lot. And if you need any more sand, just stop on by. We have enough to make a beach.” Coglin walked up to Simpson as soon as he saw he was free and said, “Guess who I just got off the phone with? Brody Graham.” A worried look sprang to Simpson’s face as he asked, “So, what did we screw up?” Coglin laughed as he shook his head. “I thought the same thing at first. And you may not believe this, but he wanted to tell me how good you guys are doing. He said you came through for him a couple of weeks ago in a big way and did the same this week. So, way to go!” Simpson nodded and replied, “Thanks. I think I know the deliveries he’s talking about. Dan mentioned that he and some of the guys had to do some real scrambling to make that happen. I’m glad it worked out.” As he spoke, his cell phone began ringing, and he said before walking away, “I’d better take this. Talk to you later.” As Coglin watched him go, he thought about Simpson’s nonchalant reaction. It was not too surprising that he was so low-key about earning praise from a tough customer. Simpson seemed to prefer to maintain an even keel at all times. It did not matter if things were going well, badly or somewhere in between,
This document is authorized for use only by Lakenya Campbell in Dynamic Leadership-Spring 2025 at Walden University (Canvas), 2025.
Page 3 9B12C048 Simpson just focused on the next thing that he needed to get done. His steady drive had always seemed to be a key strength, but recent events now made Coglin wonder if he was still the kind of manager House, Hearth and Home needed to stay competitive. A couple of months earlier, Coglin had brought in a new employee, Boyd, as assistant yard manager to help Simpson run things. Boyd started at noon and stayed till closing, well after Simpson had left for the day. Coglin had not done any recruiting for this position — Boyd was a personal friend he had known for years and with whom he played hockey and sometimes cards. When Coglin heard Boyd had been laid off from his job, he decided to offer him a position at House, Hearth, and Home to help him out. He had placed him under Simpson in the yard as an assistant manager because that area seemed to be a source of problems, and he thought Simpson could use some extra help. Coglin knew some employees might question his decision to bring in a buddy; no one liked it when some friend of the boss got special treatment. Coglin also knew he did not want to lose Boyd as a friend because of any issues at work. Overall, there was no question that hiring a friend could be a dangerous proposition and a risk he had not taken lightly. However, now that a bit of time had gone by, Coglin had to conclude that the risk seemed to be paying off, that Boyd was doing some great things. There was no doubt that Simpson was a good manager; for the most part, the yard ran pretty well. But while he was apt to simply trust that the 15 employees in that area would get their jobs done, Boyd had been much more involved. He had been getting everyone pumped up on the importance of their work and of keeping commitments to customers. Contractors had long memories; each and every delay or messed- up order could hurt the reputation of House, Hearth, and Home. On the other hand, there were lots of hidden opportunities to wow the customer. Boyd tried to make the employees see that every small action could have significant repercussions. This was contrary to the old approach, which was “stuff happens.” Coming from a large organization that had had to shut down, throwing hundreds of people out of work, Boyd could talk from experience about the importance of paying attention to what really mattered. After a few short weeks, most of the yard workers, even the part-timers, started to act as if what they did mattered. It probably helped that Boyd himself acted as if every order was the most important one of the week. He regularly skipped breaks or stayed late to make sure every customer went away satisfied. He would jump in his own car to run something out to a job site if the trucks were all being used. When the crew faced an especially busy day, he brought coffees to rally them and often bragged to customers that this team always came through. Boyd also seemed to be good at developing relationships with the employees. He tried to find out what was driving them and would pull for anyone who wanted to contribute. He had been coaching a couple of them how to take charge of the yard on weekends. They all knew they were there to do a physical job; Boyd challenged them to use their minds to do the job better. The new approach did not fly with some of the staff members, though. Certain people — mostly the underperformers — seemed to prefer being left alone. Before Boyd came, there had been many times when an employee screwed up a big order but never heard a word about it; Simpson would often quietly send another employee over to the job site with the correct materials. Sometimes Coglin had seen employees directly contravene a policy, but Simpson would let it go to avoid a fight unless Coglin pushed him to do otherwise. In contrast, Boyd made a point of confronting any employee who did not follow directions. If they had a good reason for doing things differently, he would readily change the procedure or work with the employee to reach a compromise that met the needs of the employee and the organization. If the
This document is authorized for use only by Lakenya Campbell in Dynamic Leadership-Spring 2025 at Walden University (Canvas), 2025.
Page 4 9B12C048 employee could not provide a fair rationale for bucking policy, Boyd let the person know to straighten up. This was sometimes easier said than done. Boyd had had several difficult conversations with the employees who did not want to pull with the rest of the team. In fact, he ended up letting two of them go. When pulled into the conversation, Simpson agreed that the terminations were a good idea and even admitted that they were probably long overdue. He told Coglin and Boyd directly that he was just really uncomfortable doing it himself. Coglin had long known that Simpson seemed to ignore employee issues until something blew up or someone complained. Even then, he did not like to rock the boat too much. Coglin had coached him through a number of sticky issues, but direct confrontation was something Simpson avoided whenever possible. The call from Graham pushed Coglin into looking carefully at all the changes he had been seeing in the yard since shortly after Boyd started. The two employees who had left had not been replaced, resulting in a significant cost savings. Even with fewer staff, the work was getting done better than before. Coglin realized he had been spending less time troubleshooting in the yard and fielding fewer complaints from testy contractors. In years past, running the yard was fairly straightforward, but the economic downturn and increased competition had changed the game. There was more pressure to respond quickly to customers and to anticipate how to meet their needs. It had become important that every employee use every interaction to help further the organizational goals. It was not enough to have only managers thinking and building relationships — each employee had to do that, too. The more he thought about it, the more Coglin realized that the needs of the yard had gone beyond Simpson’s capabilities. Boyd’s approach was better suited to the situation. After being in the yard such a short time, he certainly did not know everything that Simpson did, but he was able to leverage the knowledge and skills of the entire crew. It was becoming clear that Boyd was the real leader out there, although Simpson had the title. Simpson himself had commented on how much better Boyd was at dealing with employee issues. But Boyd was not going to be happy in the long term if he was doing all of the work while Simpson had the title and the pay. Boyd had not complained — yet. But Coglin knew that it simply was not fair to allow him to take on the responsibilities without being compensated in return. He wondered if he could allow this type of inequity, even if the employee was not raising a fuss. At the same time, Coglin could not forget that Simpson was a long-term employee who had shown a lot of loyalty to the company. He worked hard and he cared. This was no small thing. As Coglin walked back towards his office, he mulled over what he should do. He did not want to interrupt the momentum they had started in the yard, so he would not pull Boyd out. But should he put him in charge? If Boyd was made the leader, what should happen to Simpson? Should he be made the assistant, moved to lead another department or be asked to leave the organization? If Boyd was promoted so fast, would any of the hundred or so employees of the organization feel that Coglin was showing favouritism to a friend and disloyalty to a long-term employee? Coglin sat down at his desk and looked out the window as he thought about what to do next. Boyd had requested a meeting with him to discuss “his future with the company,” so Coglin had to decide soon how he was going to handle this situation.
This document is authorized for use only by Lakenya Campbell in Dynamic Leadership-Spring 2025 at Walden University (Canvas), 2025.
Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.
About Wridemy
We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.
How It Works
To make an Order you only need to click on “Place Order” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.
Are there Discounts?
All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.